This week I’ve been sinking a lot of time into two games,
neither of which are terribly new, but both are rated very highly. I’m new to
both of them, although one of them is a Total War game, so I’m hardly new to
the franchise. The other is a browser-based, story-heavy RPG set in ‘Fallen
London’ – a gothic, alternative-history, Victorian-era London that has been dragged below the earth
by bats – called Echo Bazaar. It’s as weird and awesome as it sounds.
These games have almost nothing in common, apart from the
fact that I am addicted to both. In fact I’m writing this in-between doing
action in Echo Bazaar. Echo Bazaar has this rather annoying mechanic that means
you only have a certain number of actions you can do per day and only a certain
number of those actions you can do at one go. You begin the day with ten
actions, and have another 30 waiting to be used. You get a new one every seven minutes
up to a limit of ten. In those seven minutes, I usually tend to busy myself
doing other stuff, or staring at the count-down clock, waiting for more
actions. This means that I get a little bit of time to sit and wonder ‘why is
this so appealing, and why am I willing to waste so much time for what amounts
to a very small amount of gameplay?’
Likewise, in Medieval Total War 2, the other game I’ve been
playing this week, you get a fair amount of time between turn to twiddle your
thumbs. While watching the computer play every other faction apart from my own,
I tend to wonder why England’s conquest of the entire western world is so damn
important that I’m inside making it happen while the hottest week of the summer
is busy happening outside (yes, at the end of September).
I’m going to university tomorrow, so I’ve also been busy
preparing everything for that. True to form, I’ve left all the important stuff
until the very end, so I’ve been fairly busy. While waiting on hold to various
banks, I’ve wondered to myself why I always seem to leave things until the last
minute before doing them. It’s not an affliction that is unique to me, by any
stretch, but it’s incredible that I could have easily done all of this
literally months ago, but didn’t. In fact I’ve been seriously lacking any motivation
all summer. Days on end with nothing to do haven’t really given me the will to
do anything. Aside the occasional moment of creative energy, I’ve really been
lacking in any desire to do anything.
All of this has leads me to ponder on the nature of
inspiration and motivation. Why do I want to desperately to conquer the Holy Land for Christendom? Why do I want to stake my soul
on a card game for the chance of wining my heart’s desires (in Echo Bazaar)?
Why do I leave it until the last minute to sort important things out? Why do I
waste time when I could be doing much more interesting things?
You might remember that a couple of weeks ago I wrote a blog
about some cooking I’ve been doing recently. I think the reason cooking appeals
to me has a lot to do with the answers to the above questions. The reason I
really like cooking is that feedback is instantaneous. You make something, it
smells good, it tastes good, you’re satisfied. You get a very simple payoff for
the effort of the cooking – you get to eat it. I have the inspiration and the
motivation to cook because I know what the outcome is and I know when it will
come.
But there’s something more than that; I don’t just enjoy
cooking because I get to eat what I cook. I am always striving to make better
and more interesting food. I make something and instantly critique it, not
because I’m not satisfied with the taste, I almost always am, but because I
want to better myself. I want to make meals that taste better because I see it
as a challenge.
These two things are a large part of what motivates me to do
things and inspires me to do them well. The outcomes of an action or the
deadline for an action to be completed are very obvious motivators. If you can
see a tangible result from your work, it’s a lot easier to get off your
backside and do it, likewise if you have to do something by a certain time, you
tend to do it.
The desire to do whatever it is I’m doing well is something
that really drives me. In part it’s about being better than other people, but
largely it’s about being bettering myself. It’s a challenge that I rise to.
This is how games like Echo Bazaar and the Total War games
pull you in. Echo Bazaar is based around numbers. Everything you do increases
or decreases your stats for certain qualities or affliction which have an
impact on what happens to your character and what options you have open to you.
It’s pretty standard RPG stuff. The reason I keep playing it is that I want to
keep pumping up my stats and so unlocking more and more of the game’s content.
The game is heavily story-based, and your stats dramatically affect the way the
story goes, so it’s not just increasing stats for the sake of it.
The Total War games use missions with a time limit and
overall victory conditions to drive your conquests, and the feedback for
success is obvious, both in easily available graphs and the map showing the
extent of your conquests to date to give you more and more things to strive
against. Game play might only be a combination of moving little men around a
map and town planning, but it’s compelling because there is a purpose and a
goal to it. I want to play because I want keep succeeding according to the
game’s definition of success.
A lot of games are built on this premise. I joke with a
friend (who is probably reading this) who plays Football Manager that he is
basically just playing with spreadsheets, but the same thing applies to FM. You
keep playing it because you want to get Worcester City
playing in the Champion’s league, no matter how meaningless that is. All RPGs
work on this premise – you play in order to keep pumping those numbers up. You
want to get a level 80 character, so you’re willing to grind for hours to get
there.
Of course sometimes games lose touch with what exactly the
end goal is. I ended up quitting playing Mass Effect and Fallout 3 because
there was too much grinding and doing what seemed like very pointless tasks
without a tangible result. I wasn’t getting any reward for my effort, or even
any success in the broader sense of the game, so couldn’t see the point of
doing it anymore.
Another similar way in which this is expressed in gaming is
scoring. Something as simple as Tetris is addictive because you have a high
score to beat. Challenge mode in Batman Arkham Asylum gave you a very simple
way of measuring yourself against both yourself and others. The combat and the stealth
mode were both wonderfully put together, but that’s no reason to keep playing
the same level again and again. The only reason do to that is to try to beat
the score you posted before.
The most interesting thing about this, however, is the way
it works in reverse. In Echo Bazaar today (while I’ve been writing this post) I
got a random ‘Opportunity’ that dramatically increased one of my stat,
increasing it to the point where I could continue on the next step of the
storyline that I’d just begun. Rather than feel happy that I’d been able to
advance without the effort of building up this stat, I felt robbed. I had been
allowed to advance without taking the effort and time to get there and it felt
wrong. It’s not like it takes any skill to play the game – it’s all dictated by
chance – but part of the reason why you become invested in the game is because
it takes time to achieve anything. It felt wrong that I hadn’t had to put that
time in, which is very strange.
The reason for that feeling is that success is not
necessarily all that fulfilling in and of itself. Success unearned or
underserved or even unworked-for is somewhat hollow. A well designed game makes
you work for your success, so it feels good when you make progress, without
allowing you to lose sight of that progression. That is why we keep returning
to some games when we’ve already played through the content.
This is true in games because it is true in real life. I
enjoy eating, but I appreciate a meal more if I’ve prepared it. Creating
something will almost always be more satisfying that experiencing someone
else’s creations. It’s not even limited to creativity; simply accomplishing
something is more rewarding that having someone do it for you, certainly in my
experience. The more challenging that accomplishment, the greater the sense of
achievement. Of course, the more detached that sense of achievement is from
actually doing the thing, the harder it is to find motivation; as was the case
with my long, lazy summer with no lengthy spell of inspiration.
That summer has now come to an end and I’m off to uni next
week, so I apologise if my blog post is late or non-existent next week, I will
probably be drunk.
No comments:
Post a Comment